"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/13/2016 at 10:00 • Filed to: None
6
10|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/13/2016 at 10:00 • Filed to: None | 6
| 10 |
Eyes and all. Still, this is worth a watch.
JR1
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/13/2016 at 10:07 |
|
Part of the reason I lust after a Hudson Hornet
Ash78, voting early and often
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/13/2016 at 10:08 |
|
Thou shalt not malign Cars (the first one) or Toy Story (any of them). If you want to talk crap among recent Disney movies, let’s start with Frozen. Come at me, sis.
MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
> Ash78, voting early and often
05/13/2016 at 10:37 |
|
Frozen may be easy to dog on, but that first song in the movie while the dudes are cutting ice is pretty badass and Olaf is funny as shit.
(I have a 3 year old and watch way too many Disney/Pixar/Dreamworks and kids cartoons)
Tom McParland
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/13/2016 at 10:52 |
|
Hey MovieSinner smartass...the scene at @11:55 with “Harv” his agent isn’t Jeremy Piven in your video. It’s Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear, the UK version had a different voice. Both are credited according to IMDB.
Also, don’t care about all your nitpicks. The movie is still awesome and my son loves Cars and cars because of this film.
|
Ash78, voting early and often
> MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
05/13/2016 at 11:00 |
|
Mine are 3 and 5, so I know the feeling. Olaf was good as the comic relief character, but they really forced him in there ("Hey, isn't this the snowman you built as a kid, but we never really talked about until just now when we needed a silly character?"). I guess I'm jaded, but even some of the less-popular movies like Tangled were a hard act to follow. That might be a little intense for age 3, but not as bad as Frozen's snow monster. And much more adult appeal.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Tom McParland
05/13/2016 at 11:02 |
|
Yeah, I noticed the whole Jeremy Piven/Jeremy Clarkson screw up.
|
MontegoMan562 is a Capri RS Owner
> Ash78, voting early and often
05/13/2016 at 11:11 |
|
Oh he’s seen it, he didn’t seem into it though.
Wreck It Ralph is top of the list right now. I commonly here “I’M A WRECKER” from him and then he picks up a toy hammer and pretends to magically fix stuff like Felix.
Rainbow
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/13/2016 at 11:12 |
|
I may be looking into it too hard, but when the car says, “There’s more to racing than just winning.” and the guy says, “Name ONE thing.”
Well, especially in NASCAR, which this is obviously based on: advertising. If that same general thing happened in real life, it wouldn’t be at all surprising for sponsors to want Lightning over Chick. After all, he’s the one getting all the positive attention, and that’s kind of the entire goal of sponsorship.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Rainbow
05/13/2016 at 11:15 |
|
nope, you're looking into it exactly the right amount.
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/13/2016 at 12:32 |
|
I lost interest in cinema sins, half the stuff is nit picky, a misunderstanding of the story or trivial details that could easily have a logical explication. It used to be better, now it’s just not fun